| Challenges: |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Lack of real time information on the whereabouts of officers and vehicles on duty |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Increased communication costs in trying to find where officers are located
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Delayed emergency responses- as on a lot of occasions, the vehicles nearest to the site of emergency are not sent but the ones which are actually quite far away are, owing to lack of information on fleet status
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Insufficient safety of officers on dangerous missions |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Substandard Service - as a result of errant officers flouting duty |
|
| |
|
|
|
| Benefits: |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
24x7 Visibility - Real time tracking of entire fleet on street level maps |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Reduced Communication Costs - Using the 2-way communication option |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Enhanced Response Time - The 'nearest vehicle finder' feature allows the control station to find the vehicle nearest to the accident/ crime area and send a response team quickly |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Increased Safety - Officers can use the SOS button to alert control center in cases of emergency |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
 |
Improved Efficiency - It is now possible to put a check on errant officers; for example the way point feature allows the control station to record whether a patrol vehicle covers all the areas it is supposed to cover |
|
| |
|
|
|